By Chenab Solicitors | Family Lawyers in Multan, Pakistan

For many women facing an unhappy or abusive marriage, the words Khula and divorce are often used interchangeably. Legally, however, they are not necessarily the same thing.

This distinction has become particularly important following a significant 2026 judgment of the Supreme Court of Pakistan, which addressed what a Family Court should do when a wife asks for dissolution of marriage on the grounds of cruelty but is unable to prove her allegations to the required standard.

The Supreme Court made an important point: a Family Court should not automatically convert a wife’s claim for dissolution on grounds of cruelty into Khula without obtaining her clear and informed consent, particularly where doing so could affect important financial rights such as unpaid Haq Mehr and maintenance.

For women considering proceedings before a Family Court in Multan or elsewhere in Punjab, this distinction can be extremely important.

What is the difference between Khula and dissolution on grounds of cruelty?

Although both remedies can ultimately result in the end of a marriage, they are based on different legal principles.

Khula is a form of dissolution initiated by the wife where she seeks to end the marriage because she is no longer willing to continue the marital relationship. In a Khula case, the question is not necessarily whether the husband has committed a legally recognised wrong.

By contrast, a wife may seek dissolution of marriage on statutory grounds, including cruelty, under the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939.

This distinction matters because the financial consequences can be different.

In particular, where a wife establishes a statutory ground for dissolution, her right to dower is not automatically treated in the same way as it would be in a Khula proceeding. The Supreme Court has previously recognised that dissolution under the statutory grounds and Khula operate in distinct legal domains and can have different consequences for dower.

What did the Supreme Court decide in 2026?

The case before the Supreme Court involved a woman who had approached the Family Court seeking dissolution of her marriage on grounds including cruelty.

She also claimed 30 tolas of gold as Haq Mehr and sought maintenance.

Her allegations included harsh treatment, coercion, humiliation, mental torture and being expelled from the matrimonial home.

The lower courts ultimately dissolved the marriage through Khula after the allegations of cruelty were not sufficiently established.

The matter eventually reached the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court held that where a wife has specifically brought a case on the basis of cruelty and valuable financial rights are involved, the court should not ordinarily impose Khula without her consent or clear election.

If the allegations of cruelty are not proved, but it is clear that the marriage has effectively broken down and the wife remains unwilling to continue the relationship, the court should give her a choice.

She may decide whether to:

1. Continue pursuing her claim for dissolution on the grounds of cruelty; or
2. Accept dissolution through Khula, with the legal consequences that follow from that choice.

The Supreme Court made it clear that the court should not simply make that decision for her.

Why does this matter for Haq Mehr?

This may be one of the most important practical aspects of the judgment.

A woman who approaches a Family Court because of alleged cruelty may also have substantial financial claims against her husband.

These may include:

• unpaid Haq Mehr;
• maintenance;
• past maintenance;
• other financial claims arising from the marriage.

If her case is simply converted into Khula, the legal consequences may be different from those attached to a successful claim for dissolution on a statutory ground.

The Supreme Court therefore recognised that automatically converting a cruelty-based claim into Khula could potentially prejudice valuable financial rights.

This is why the legal basis on which a marriage is dissolved matters.

Does this mean a wife can never get Khula if she fails to prove cruelty?

No.

That is an important point.

The Supreme Court did not say that a woman must prove cruelty before she can obtain Khula.

Rather, it recognised that if a woman has brought a case specifically alleging cruelty and the allegations are not established, the court should not simply assume that she wants Khula.

If the marriage has effectively broken down and the wife does not wish to continue living with her husband, she should be given the opportunity to make an informed choice about whether she wants to proceed with Khula.

In other words:

Failure to prove cruelty does not automatically equal consent to Khula.

That distinction is central to the 2026 judgment.

What counts as cruelty in a Pakistani family-law case?

Cruelty is not necessarily limited to physical violence.

The Supreme Court’s 2026 ruling also discussed a broader understanding of domestic and matrimonial cruelty.

Depending on the circumstances, cruelty may involve:

• physical abuse;
• psychological or mental torture;
• persistent humiliation;
• coercion;
• emotional abuse;
• serious neglect;
• conduct that makes continued matrimonial life unbearable.

The Court also cautioned Family Courts against applying evidentiary standards appropriate to criminal trials in matrimonial disputes. Family disputes are generally assessed on the preponderance of probabilities, rather than the criminal standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt.

This is significant because domestic abuse often happens privately, without independent witnesses.

A woman should therefore not assume that the absence of an FIR or eyewitness automatically means that a cruelty claim cannot succeed.

At the same time, making an allegation is not the same as proving it. The facts, documents, circumstances and available evidence still matter.

What evidence can be useful in a cruelty case?

Every case is different, but evidence may include:

• medical records;
• photographs;
• messages and WhatsApp conversations;
• emails;
• recordings where legally admissible;
• police complaints;
• previous applications or complaints to relevant authorities;
• witness testimony;
• evidence of abandonment;
• evidence of financial neglect;
• evidence relating to repeated threats or harassment;
• other documents that corroborate the wife’s account.

The strength of a case will depend on its particular facts and the evidence available.

A Family Court in Multan will consider the evidence placed before it; therefore, simply having a long list of allegations does not necessarily make a case strong.

What does the judgment mean for women in Multan?

For women in Multan, Khanewal, Lodhran, Vehari, Bahawalpur and other parts of South Punjab, the judgment is particularly relevant when deciding how to structure a family-law case.

A woman who has genuinely suffered cruelty should understand that there may be a significant legal difference between saying:

“I no longer want to remain married.”

and saying:

“I want dissolution of my marriage because of specific acts of cruelty committed by my husband.”

Those are not necessarily the same legal claim.

The appropriate remedy may depend on the facts of the marriage, the evidence available and the financial rights involved.

This is one reason why obtaining legal advice before filing a Family Court case can be important.

Should you file for Khula or dissolution on grounds of cruelty?

There is no universal answer.

Khula may be appropriate where a woman simply does not wish to continue the marriage and does not intend to pursue a claim based on the husband’s misconduct.

However, where there are genuine allegations of cruelty, domestic abuse, abandonment, serious neglect or other legally recognised grounds, it may be important to consider whether the case should instead be pursued as a dissolution of marriage on statutory grounds.

The financial consequences can also be significant.

For example, a woman with an unpaid Haq Mehr should not assume that choosing one remedy over another will have no financial consequences.

The correct legal strategy depends on the individual circumstances.

What about a “dead marriage”?

The Supreme Court also recognised an important practical reality.

Courts should not mechanically keep a marriage alive when it has clearly broken down.

At the same time, the solution cannot simply be to impose Khula upon a woman who specifically brought a case on grounds of cruelty and did not ask for Khula.

The proper approach is to respect the woman’s legal choice.

Where cruelty is not proved but the marriage has effectively collapsed, she should be given the opportunity to decide whether she wants to pursue her original claim or accept Khula on the applicable terms.

Khula vs cruelty-based dissolution: a simple comparison

Issue	Khula	Dissolution on grounds of cruelty
Who initiates the claim?	Wife	Wife
Must cruelty be proved?	No, not necessarily	Yes, if cruelty is the ground relied upon
Is the wife’s clear choice important?	Yes	Yes
Can financial rights be affected?	Yes	Yes, but consequences may differ
Is Haq Mehr automatically forfeited?	Financial consequences can arise depending on the circumstances and applicable law	Not automatically forfeited merely because the marriage is dissolved on a statutory ground
Evidence of cruelty required?	Not necessarily	Yes, where cruelty is relied upon
Relevant where marriage has broken down?	Yes	Yes, where a statutory ground is established

What should a woman do before filing a case?

Before filing a petition for Khula or dissolution of marriage, it is worth looking at the complete picture.

Consider:

1. What exactly happened?

Write down the important incidents, including approximate dates and locations.

2. Is there evidence?

Preserve messages, medical documents, complaints and other relevant material.

3. What is mentioned in the Nikahnama?

The amount and terms of Haq Mehr can become extremely important.

4. Is there unpaid maintenance?

Consider whether maintenance claims need to be pursued alongside the dissolution proceedings.

5. Are there children?

If there are children, custody, visitation and maintenance may need to be considered separately.

6. What outcome do you actually want?

Do you simply want the marriage to end, or do you also want to pursue legal claims based on cruelty and protect your financial rights?

These questions can materially affect the legal strategy.

The 2026 Supreme Court ruling in simple terms

The easiest way to understand the judgment is this:

A woman who files a case alleging cruelty should not automatically be given Khula simply because the court does not find the cruelty sufficiently proved.

If she still wants the marriage to end, the court should explain the available legal route and obtain her clear, informed and voluntary choice, particularly where her financial rights may be affected.

This is an important safeguard because the difference between Khula and dissolution on statutory grounds can extend beyond the simple question of whether the marriage ends.

It can affect the financial and legal consequences that follow.

Need legal advice about Khula or divorce in Multan?

If you are considering Khula, dissolution of marriage on grounds of cruelty, recovery of Haq Mehr, maintenance or child custody, it is important to consider the legal route before filing the case.

At Chenab Solicitors, Multan, we assist clients with family-law matters in Multan and throughout South Punjab.

Every marriage and every family dispute has different facts. The appropriate remedy should therefore be considered on the basis of the particular circumstances rather than simply following a standard Khula procedure.

If you are unsure whether Khula or dissolution on grounds of cruelty is the appropriate option, seek professional legal advice before filing your case.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Khula the same as divorce in Pakistan?

Not exactly. Khula and dissolution of marriage on statutory grounds are distinct legal remedies and can have different legal and financial consequences.

Can a wife get Khula without proving cruelty?

Yes. Khula does not generally depend upon proving a specific statutory ground of cruelty. However, where a wife has filed a case specifically alleging cruelty, the 2026 Supreme Court judgment says that the court should not automatically convert that claim into Khula without her clear consent.

Can a Family Court force a woman to take Khula?

The Supreme Court’s 2026 ruling makes clear that where a wife has pursued dissolution on grounds of cruelty, Khula should not ordinarily be imposed without her consent or clear election, particularly where valuable financial rights are involved.

Can mental cruelty be a ground for dissolution?

Mental and psychological abuse can be relevant to a cruelty claim. The Supreme Court has recognised that cruelty is not confined to physical violence and can include psychological harm, humiliation, coercion and emotional suffering.

Will a woman automatically lose Haq Mehr if she takes Khula?

The financial consequences of Khula depend on the circumstances and applicable law. A woman should not assume that Khula and dissolution on statutory grounds have identical consequences for Haq Mehr.

Can I file a Khula or family case in Multan?

Family law proceedings are governed by jurisdictional rules, so whether a particular case can be filed in Multan depends on the circumstances and applicable law. A lawyer can advise you on the appropriate Family Court and procedure.

---

Legal Disclaimer: This article is intended for general legal information and does not constitute legal advice. Pakistani family law can be fact-specific, and recent judgments may change how particular issues are interpreted. If you are considering filing a case, obtain advice based on your individual circumstances and documents.